North Korea’s missile launches Monday came as the Donald Trump administration in the US shapes its policy for Pyongyang, one of the thorniest diplomatic and security challenges it faces.
The firing was largely seen as an all-too-familiar show of force against the South Korea-US annual joint military drills that kicked off Wednesday for a two-month run.
But the event may also mean a fresh test for the nascent US leadership’s resolve as it maps out its North Korea policy vision, expected as early as this month. Trump has called Pyongyang a “big problem” and pledged to respond “very strongly,” but has so far not translated words into action.
Citizens watch a broadcast of North Korea’s launch of ballistic missiles to the East Sea at Seoul Station on Monday. (Yonhap)
Calls have been rising in Washington to harden the approach to the headstrong Kim Jong-un regime, which could include steps such as a preventive strike on nuclear facilities, a return of nuclear weapons to South Korea and efforts to force a regime change.
The mood has soured, especially after the North test-fired a new intermediate-range ballistic missile, the Pukguksong 2, last month.
The New York Times reported Saturday that Trump’s national security deputies recently held two meetings to explore all options, saying a reintroduction of nuclear weapons to the South would be a “dramatic warning.” Last week, the Wall Street Journal reported the White House had explored the possibility of military force and a regime change in its review of strategy for thwarting the regime’s nuclear ambition.
None of those measures seem to have much chance of becoming a concrete policy at this point, given the high risks they pose of military escalation and backlash from China, the North’s prime backer.
Around Seoul and Washington, however, the prevalent sentiment is that conventional approaches such as aid-for-moratorium negotiations have already proved futile, and a new idea is needed.
A potential game changer is Pyongyang’s mastering of technology for an intercontinental ballistic missile, which it has threatened to fire since Kim’s New Year’s address.
With the Trump administration forming its North Korea policy, meanwhile, concerns are growing here over the lack of top-level coordination in the face of President Park Geun-hye’s absence from duty.
The New York Times’ report on tactical nuclear weapons caught some Seoul officials by surprise, though they acknowledge the fundamental need for any new administration to examine all policy options.
Last year, the issue brought a headache to officials in Seoul and the US, as some leading lawmakers and scholars here relayed calls for a redeployment of the weapons and even the start of South Korea’s own nuclear weapons program after Pyongyang’s fifth nuclear test in September.
The US withdrew tactical nuclear weapons in line with a 1991 inter-Korean denuclearization declaration. Advocates argue the bombs’ reintroduction could be an effective countermove to Pyongyang, saying the text has virtually become a “dead letter.”
The debate may heat up again ahead of a presidential election this year, with leading candidates churning out their views for and against the redeployment issue Monday.
Seoul, for its part, is seeking to boost policy coordination with Washington, while speeding up the stationing of the US’ Terminal High Altitude Area Defense missile shield here this year. US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson is also expected to make his first visit here late this month as part of his Asia tour that also includes stops in Tokyo and Beijing.
“I believe the reintroduction of tactical nuclear weapons was brought up as an option, not part of the alliance discussions, as all new administrations in not just the US but also South Korea carry out a comprehensive policy overhaul,” a Seoul official said, requesting anonymity due to the sensitivity of the matter.
By Shin Hyon-hee (heeshin@heraldcorp.com)
