[Robert B. Reich] A strategy to split working Americans
The Republican strategy is to split the vast middle and working class ― pitting unionized workers against non-unionized, public-sector workers against non-public, older workers within sight of Medicare and Social Security against younger workers who don’t believe these programs will be there for them, and the poor against the working middle class.
By splitting working America along these lines, Republicans want Americans to believe that we can no longer afford to do what we need to do as a nation. They hope to deflect attention from the increasing share of total income and wealth going to the richest 1 percent while the jobs and wages of everyone else languish.
Republicans would rather no one notice their campaign to provide additional tax cuts for the rich ― making the Bush tax cuts permanent, further reducing the estate tax, and allowing the wealthy to shift ever more of their income into capital gains taxed at 15 percent.
The strategy has three parts.
The first is being played out in the budget battle in Washington. As they raise the alarm over deficit spending and simultaneously squeeze popular middle-class programs, Republicans want the majority of the American public to view it all as a giant zero-sum game among average Americans that some will have to lose.
The president has already fallen into the trap by calling for budget cuts in programs the poor and working class depend on ― assistance with home heating, community services, college loans and the like.
In the coming showdown over Medicare and Social Security, House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan will push a voucher system for Medicare and a partly privatized plan for Social Security ― both designed to attract younger middle-class voters.
The second part of the Republican strategy is being played out on the state level, where public employees are being blamed for state budget crises. Unions didn’t cause these budget crises ― state revenues dropped because of the Great Recession ― but Republicans view them as opportunities to gut public employee unions, starting with teachers.
Wisconsin’s Republican governor, Scott Walker, and his GOP-majority legislature are seeking to end almost all union rights for teachers. Ohio’s Republican governor, John Kasich, is pushing a similar plan through a Republican-dominated legislature. New Jersey’s Republican governor, Chris Christie, is attempting the same, telling a conservative conference last week, “I’m attacking the leadership of the union because they’re greedy, and they’re selfish and they’re self-interested.”
The demonizing of public employees is not only based on the lie that they’ve caused these budget crises, but it’s also premised on a second lie: that public employees earn more than private-sector workers.
They don’t, when you take account of their education. In fact over the last 15 years the pay of public-sector workers, including teachers, has dropped relative to private-sector employees with the same level of education ― even including health and retirement benefits.
Moreover, most public employees don’t have generous pensions. After a career with annual pay averaging less than $45,000, the typical newly retired public employee receives a pension of $19,000 a year.
Republicans would rather go after teachers and other public employees than have us look at the pay of Wall Street traders, private-equity managers and heads of hedge funds ― many of whom wouldn’t have their jobs today were it not for the giant taxpayer-supported bailout, and most of whose lending and investing practices were the proximate cause of the Great Depression to begin with.
Last year, America’s top thirteen hedge-fund managers earned an average of $1 billion each. One of them took home $5 billion. Much of their income is taxed as capital gains ― at 15 percent ― due to a tax loophole that Republican members of Congress have steadfastly guarded.
The third part of the Republican strategy is being played out in the Supreme Court. It has politicized the court more than at any time in recent memory.
Last year, a majority of the justices determined that corporations have a right under the First Amendment to provide unlimited amounts of money to political candidates. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is among the most patently political and legally grotesque decisions of our highest court ― ranking right up there with Bush v. Gore and Dred Scott v. Sandford.
Among those who voted in the affirmative were Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia. Both have become active strategists in the Republican Party.
Some time this year or next, the Supreme Court will be asked to consider whether the nation’s new health-care law is constitutional. Watch your wallets.
These three aspects of the Republican strategy ― a federal budget battle to shrink government, focused on programs the vast middle class depends on; state efforts to undermine public employees, whom the middle class depends on; and a Supreme Court dedicated to bending the Constitution to enlarge and entrench the political power of the wealthy ― fit perfectly together.
They pit average working Americans against one another, distract attention from the almost unprecedented concentration of wealth and power at the top, and conceal Republican plans to further enlarge and entrench that wealth and power.
What is the Democratic strategy to counter this and reclaim America for the rest of us?
By Robert B. Reich
Robert Reich, a former U.S. secretary of labor, is a professor of public policy at the University of California at Berkeley and the author of the new book “Aftershock: The Next Economy and America’s Future.” ― Ed.
(Tribune Media Services)